K-12 School Leadership Project
PURPOSE OF PROJECT
The Pennsylvania K-12 Leadership Project will focus on issues
pertaining to school district superintendents and school
principals. It will:
- Identify and illuminate the knowledge and skill base
necessary for successful school and district administration.
- Relate these findings to current preparation programs and
professional development opportunities to identify gaps.
- Identify current and anticipated supply and demand
(relying as appropriate on recent work of the Legislative
Joint State Government Commission).
- Identify exemplary programs of administrator recruitment
and induction, to the degree such programs are validated as
being effective.
- Develop and propose policy recommendations to state
policymakers, school boards, and administrator preparation
institutions.
ISSUE
Decades of effective schools research -- going back to the
work of Ron Edmonds in the 1960s - continue to find a strong
relationship between effective instructional leadership of
schools and high levels of student achievement. Leading
schools and districts has become more complex than ever
before, due in part to increased pressure to perform,
increased diversity of students, and an unstable political
environment within which schools must operate.
The National Commission on Governing America's Schools
reported in 1999 on the need to rethink the roles of school
boards and superintendents so they are responsible for
creating a district mission and for holding schools
accountable for achieving results. This kind of shift will
require additional training for most superintendents and
school board members. Recent reports by the two national
principals associations make clear that multiple demands and
conflicting priorities make it difficult for principals to
focus on school improvement to the degree they think they
should.
Since the issuance of these important studies, school and
district leaders have come under even more scrutiny and
accountability, especially as a result of the federal No Child
Left Behind Act.
As waves of school and district administrators - particularly
principals and superintendents - retire, there is an emerging
national shortage of highly qualified school leaders, although
recent research suggests this problem may be concentrated in
schools with the most challenging working conditions, high
concentrations of poor and minority students, and low
salaries. Anecdotal information suggests that at least some
Pennsylvania schools and districts are facing similar
problems. There is evidence that the academic programs and
professional experience of would-be administrators does not
adequately prepare them for the challenges they will face, nor
is much of the in-service professional development meeting
their very real needs. This problem is compounded by
increasing pressure on administrators for student performance
improvements and, in many places, declining salaries relative
to those of teachers. Pennsylvania school district
administrators face even greater demands for relatively lower
salaries than their peers nationally.
In order to deal with shortages in administrator candidates
and promote non-traditional school leadership models, states
and districts have begun recruiting superintendents and
principals from the military, corporate, and government
worlds.
What are the characteristics of effective leadership for 21st
century schools and districts in a standards-driven system?
There appears to be a growing consensus that school leaders
must be first and foremost instructional leaders (although
most have had training that focuses primarily upon management
of the day-to-day affairs of the school). Other necessary
characteristics include communication skills, collaboration,
community building (both within and outside the school),
ability to articulate and be guided by a clear vision, and
willingness to take risks and lead change. "Quality education
leadership [is] a core element of school reform."
KEY QUESTIONS
- What are and should be the roles of school superintendents
and principals?
- What skills are needed to fulfill those roles effectively?
Do those skills vary by type of community and size of school
or district? Are they different for elementary and secondary
school principals?
- What models of pre-service and in-service learning would
best prepare future school leaders?
- What can be learned from the experiences of school and
district leaders with non-traditional backgrounds?
- What is the size and skill level of the "pool" of
potential school superintendents and principals in
Pennsylvania?
- What can be done through state and local policy to
redefine the roles of school leaders, increase the
appropriateness of their preparation for these roles, improve
the quality of the pool from which they will be selected, and
promote the placement of highly qualified administrators in
hard-to-staff schools and districts?
PROJECT APPROACH
The Pennsylvania K-12 Leadership Project is jointly
sponsored by The Education Policy and Leadership Center
(EPLC), the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators
(PASA), and the Pennsylvania Associations of Elementary and
Secondary School Principals (PAESSP). The effort to address
the key questions identified above will be directed by The
Education Policy and Leadership Center. Dr. Robert E. Feir,
senior fellow of EPLC and president of EdStrat21 (a
Harrisburg-based education strategies consulting firm), will
serve as project consultant.
EPLC has appointed a study group of approximately 20
individuals to review research findings and offer advice to
the Center on general direction of the project and on final
results and recommendations. A final report will be issued at
the end of the project period.